Legal Opinion
People v. Reichenbach
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1998No. 109961, Calendar No. 5PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave to consider the portion of MCR 6.610(E)(2) that precludes use of a misdemeanor conviction resulting from defendant’s uncoun-seled guilty plea to enhance the sentence in the case at bar.
Defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (ouil) or operating a motor vehicle with an unlawful blood alcohol level (ubal), third offense (OUIL 3d), pursuant to MCL 257.625(7)(d); MSA 9.2325(7)(d). The felony charge was based on two previous plea-based convictions, one in 1989 and one in 1991. At the preliminary examination on November…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. HickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. GoodinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.