Legal Opinion

Vanieken-Ryals v. Office of Personnel Management

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 26, 2007No. 2006-3260PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Chief Judge.

Phyllis M. Vanieken-Ryals appeals from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) sustaining the denial of her application for disability retirement benefits by the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”). Vanieken-Ryals v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 102 M.S.P.R. 236 (M.S.P.B.2006). Because OPM applied an erroneous legal standard in its assessment of evidence offered to support Vanieken-Ryals’ application, and the MSPB repeated that error, we vacate and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

Vanieken-Ryals has been an employee of the Veterans Administration (“VA”) for nearly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Scroggins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. William A. Anthony v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Thomas N. Trevan v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Reilly v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Cabanayan v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API