Legal Opinion

Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1985No. 83-5954PublishedCited by 554 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “determine[s] questions of disability and dependency” in administering the Federal Government’s provision of annuities to retired employees and their dependents. 5 U. S. C. § 8347(c). Subject to administrative review by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), § 8347(d)(1), OPM’s “decisions . . . concerning these matters are final and conclusive and are not subject to review,” § 8347(c). This case presents two questions of substantial importance to the administration of the Government’s retirement annuity program. The first is whether § 8347(c) bars…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by554 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

549 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API