Taylor v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record and supplemental briefing. Plaintiff, having been permanently retired for medical reasons with a 30% disability rating, contends that she deserves a 70% disability rating, contrary to the decision of a board for correction of military records, which, plaintiff argues, failed to apply properly the rating criteria of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
FACTS
I. Background
The facts contained herein are drawn from the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ulysses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Nathan T. Meidl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Yearwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015