Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 20, 2012No. 11-340CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record and supplemental briefing. Plaintiff, having been permanently retired for medical reasons with a 30% disability rating, contends that she deserves a 70% disability rating, contrary to the decision of a board for correction of military records, which, plaintiff argues, failed to apply properly the rating criteria of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

FACTS

I. Background

The facts contained herein are drawn from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ulysses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Nathan T. Meidl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Yearwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API