Legal Opinion

National Equipment Corp. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1933No. 29,607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

In the spring of 1930 plaintiff sold and delivered to defendants under the terms of a conditional sales contract two dumptors, complete with tAvin gasolene power, five-yard capacity dump bodies and hydraulic hoists, for the price of $11,300. The title was to remain in plaintiff until fully paid. The contract provided that upon default in the payment of any instalment plaintiff could repossess the dumptors. There was a default, and plaintiff repleAded the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Baumgartner v. GlesenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Renne v. VolkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. National Equipment Corp. v. VoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. McPeak v. BokerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Nelson v. the Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API