Legal Opinion

McPeak v. Boker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1952No. 35,714PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Washington county denying the alternative motion of defendant William E. Boker (hereinafter referred to as appellant) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The action was for breach of warranty in the sale of a cruiser. While appellant assigns numerous errors, it is conceded that only one question is presented for decision. That is whether a purported disclaimer in the bill of sale was an effective disclaimer as to an implied warranty of fitness for use.

Appellant was the owner of the cruiser,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp. v. ShanusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Clements Auto Company v. Service Bureau CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API