Legal Opinion

Renne v. Volk

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*510The following opinion was filed October 20, 1925:

Eschweiler, J.

The contract contained the following provision:

“If the purchaser shall instruct the company not to ship the material, the company may at its option either hold the goods for the purchaser or. deliver the material to a common carrier consigned to the purchaser, and either action on the part of the company shall be considered as full performance of the contract by the company.”

Except for such provision it is clear that under the general rules' of law as well as under the Uniform Sales Act there could be no recovery of the purchase…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. W. F. Hurd Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Haueter v. MartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. HockingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Palaniuk v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. International Milling Co. v. North Platte Flour MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. National Equipment Corp. v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API