Legal Opinion
Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. Brown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 23, 1931No. 28,207PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendants H. Rowatt and Frances M. Brown appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien based on the installation of an Iron Fireman coal stoker. The court found, as defendants claimed, that it would not do the work for which it was sold and purchased though reasonable efforts had been made to have it do so. The court later granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings so as to give plaintiff the relief sought. This was upon the theory that the article was sold under a trade-name within G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 8390(4) and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Ireland v. Louis K. Liggett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Inter-State Grocer Co. v. George William Bentley Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Casey Land AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Hughes v. National Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.