Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Glesener

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1927No. 25,940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Respondent recovered a verdict in an action for damages for breach of warranty of seed corn grown and sold by appellant, who has appealed from an order denying a new trial.

In March and April, 1925, appellant published an advertisement in Renville county newspapers offering for sale Yellow Murdock 1923 seed corn and representing that the corn was graded, well acclimated to Renville county, and that its germinating test was 95 per cent. Respondent saw the advertisement, called on appellant, purchased some of the corn and planted it in a field of 30 acres, of which four acres were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. G. B. Shaw & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Butler v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. Moore v. KogerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Masepohl v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Stephen Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. City of Wyoming v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API