Legal Opinion

In Re Annexation Proposed by Annexation Ordinance Number X-07-91

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1995No. 02A04-9406-CV-216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Defendant-Appellant, (“Remonstrators”), appeal the trial court’s denial of their remonstrance to Plaintiff-Appellee’s, City of Fort Wayne’s (“City’s”), annexation proposal. Having reviewed the evidence, findings, and conclusions of law, we affirm.

Issue

Remonstrators present one issue for our review, which we restate as follows: whether the specific findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court were clearly erroneous.

Facts and Procedural History

The City of Fort Wayne Common Council adopted Annexation Ordinance X-07-91 and fiscal plan R-78-91…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Ass'n v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Fuehrer v. StormIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. City of Muncie v. Certain Halteman Village Section IIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Town of Whitestown, Indiana v. Rural Perry Township LandownersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Wildwood Acres Trust v. First Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API