Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. BRYANT
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1960No. 29,780PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
This action was brought under Acts 1949, ch. 216, §2, p. 701, being §48-702, Burns’ 1950 Replacement. 1
The Common Council of appellant City of Aurora adopted an ordinance annexing certain territory under the provisions of Acts 1905, ch. 129, §242, being §48-701, Burns’ 1950 Replacement. Less than 51% of the persons owning property in the territory sought to be annexed filed their written remonstrances in the Dear-born Circuit Court. After hearing evidence, the trial court found that “the adding of the territory sought to be annexed to the City of Aurora will not be for its interest,” and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Galesburg v. HawkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Wright-Bachman, Inc. v. HODNETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Clemons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- City of Hobart v. ChidesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.