Legal Opinion
City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. Wynn
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1959No. 29,724PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
This action is here because it presents the question of the validity of an Ordinance of the City of Indianapolis, the purpose of which was to annex an area entirely surrounded by such city and known as the Town of Woodruff Place. (Acts 1905, ch. 129, §242, p. 219, being §48-701, Burns’ 1950 Replacement.)
On September 9, 1953, the Common Council of appellant City of Indianapolis passed Special Ordinance No. 11,1953 to annex certain territory described therein, and providing that such Ordinance be in full force and effect “from and after its passage, approval by the Mayor, and publication…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blood v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Chadwick, Treasurer v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Jordan v. Breece Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1914
- Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.