Legal Opinion
Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2015No. 32A01-1407-PL-300PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
Statement of the Case
[1] This appeal involves the statutory process remonstrators must follow when opposing an annexation ordinance. That process begins with the filing of a remonstrance petition under Indiana Code Section 36-4-3-11(a), which requires in relevant part that the petition: (1) include the signatures of at least sixty-five percent of the landowners in the annexed territory; (2)be filed within ninety days after the ordinance is published; (3) be accompanied by a copy of the ordinance; and (4) state the reason why the annexation should not take place. Indiana Code…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Mathews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Troxel v. TroxelIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roger S. Blackman v. Karen A. Gholson and James W. BlackmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Stephanie A. Schrage v. The Audrey R. Seberger Living Trust u/t/d April 27, 2009 John R. O'Drobinak as Successor TrusteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Molly A. Melton v. Indiana Athletic Trainers Board, David Craig, A.T., in his official and individual capacity, Larry Leverenz, A.T., in his official and individual capacityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- D.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Certain Tell City Annexation Territory Landowners v. Tell City, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.