Legal Opinion
Fuehrer v. Storm
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2002No. 32A01-0108-CV-298PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
- KIRSCH, Judge.
Reece R. and Carolyn S. Fuehrer and Gary and Bonnie J. DeGolyer ("Landowners") challenge the trial court's judgment holding certain annexation ordinances of the Town of Lizton, Indiana void, raising the following issues for review:
I. Whether William and Concetta Storm and Anna Shelton ("Re-monstrators") have standing to challenge the ordinances.
II. Whether the trial court erred in denying Landowners motion to strike portions of the affidavit of William Storm as legal conclusions and statements not based on personal knowledge.
*626III, Whether a municipality may meet the.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Stevenson v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Estate of WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Midwest Psychological Center, Inc. v. Indiana Department of AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- City of Boonville v. American Cold StorageIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.