Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. Rittenhouse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1991No. 82A01-9012-CV-524PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellees, James and Betty Rittenhouse, purchased a 20-acre tract of agriculturally zoned land adjacent to Interstate Highway 164 (I-164) in Vanderburgh County. They subsequently petitioned the Evansville-Vanderburgh Area Plan Commission (the APC) and the Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners (the Commissioners), requesting the property be rezoned for light industrial purposes. The Commissioners denied the petition, and the Rittenhouses brought suit in Vanderburgh Superior Court, alleging the denial was invalid and amounted to a taking of their property…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of SnemisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Willett v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. McClamroch v. McClamrochIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Board of Zoning Appeals v. SCHULTE, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Ahuja v. Lynco Ltd. Medical ResearchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Shafer v. LambieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Lever Bros. Co. v. LangdocIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API