Legal Opinion
Hertzberg v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-2494PLFPublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, declarations submitted and the applicable law, the Court grants defendant’s motion and enters summary judgment for defendant on all claims, except with respect to the application of Exemption 6 withholding to six videotapes and the issue of segregability with respect to six documents.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Michael A. Hertzberg brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., to compel…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Border PatrolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bigwood v. United States Agency for International DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Beltranena v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Concepcion v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Amuso v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.