Legal Opinion
Beltranena v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1457 (PLF)PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This Freedom of Information Act case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, defendant’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, and defendant’s motion for a protective order. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers, the attached declarations and exhibits, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will deny without prejudice defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and supplemental motion for summary judgment, and the Court will grant defendant’s motion for a protective…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Rosenberg v. U.S. Dep't of Def.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Georgacarakos v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Beltranena v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lewis v. Executive Office for United State AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McRae v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.