Legal Opinion
Spease and Ross v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 27, 1975No. [No. 120, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.
Eldridge, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 110 infra.
Charged in the Circuit Court for Prince' George’s County with conspiracy to distribute cocaine, Clifton Spease and Willie Ross filed an oral motion prior to trial to suppress incriminating evidence obtained through a court-authorized telephone wiretap; they contended that the State had violated the terms of the court’s wiretap order and the provisions of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Chapter 119, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520, by not minimizing the interception of communications as required…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. CataniaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Poore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Ezenwa v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.