Iannelli v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
This case requires the Court to consider Wharton’s Rule, a doctrine of criminal law enunciating an exception to the general principle that a conspiracy and the substantive offense that is its immediate end are discrete crimes for which separate sanctions may be imposed.
I
Petitioners were tried under a six-count indictment alleging a variety of federal gambling offenses. Each of the eight petitioners, along with seven unindieted cocon-spirators and six codefendants, was charged, inter alia, *772with conspiring1 to violate and violating 18 U. S. C. § 1955, a federal gambling statute making it a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,313 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
1,308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.