Legal Opinion

Iannelli v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1975No. 73-64PublishedCited by 1,313 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

This case requires the Court to consider Wharton’s Rule, a doctrine of criminal law enunciating an exception to the general principle that a conspiracy and the substantive offense that is its immediate end are discrete crimes for which separate sanctions may be imposed.

I

Petitioners were tried under a six-count indictment alleging a variety of federal gambling offenses. Each of the eight petitioners, along with seven unindieted cocon-spirators and six codefendants, was charged, inter alia, *772with conspiring1 to violate and violating 18 U. S. C. § 1955, a federal gambling statute making it a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,313 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

1,308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API