Legal Opinion

State v. Catania

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1981PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

WILENTZ, C. J.

In this case we are called upon to interpret the minimization provision, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-12(f), of New Jersey’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (“Wiretap Act”). That provision requires those charged with monitoring the wiretap to make reasonable efforts to “minimize or eliminate the interception” of conversations other than those they have been authorized to overhear. This provision plays a crucial role in our overall wiretapping scheme, being one of the few provisions which regulate the conduct of police to protect…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. State v. KnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. State v. KovackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API