Legal Opinion

Poore v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1978No. 649, September Term, 1977PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

I

THE FEDERAL WIRETAP AND ELECTRONIC EAVESDROPPING LAW AND ITS EFFECT UPON STATE LAW.

Judge Orth (later Chief Judge and now an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals), in State v. Siegel, 13 Md. App. 444, 285 A. 2d 671 (1971), aff’d 266 Md. 256, 292 A. 2d 86 (1972), discussed the judicial history which “cleared the way for the enactment of legislation giving sanction to the interception of wire or oral communications,” 13 Md. App. at 448-49, 285 A. 2d at 674, the constitutionality of the Omnibus Crime Control and.Safe Streets Act of June 19, 1968 (Title III 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520) and the use…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Watwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Ezenwa v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Shingleton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API