King v. Ford River Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Delta. (Stone, J.) Negligence ease. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Plaintiff had judgment against the owners of a saw-mill, for injuries received by him while at work near a revolving shaft, being thrown against it, his arm taken off, and otherwise severely injured.
The rough sketch on next page will aid in the description of the place of the injury.
The conductor is a trough 14 or 15 inches deep, 28 inches wide at the bottom, and 40 inches wide at the top. Along the bottom an endless chain operates a conveyor, which carries the slabs and mill refuse out of the mill to the burner. The large chute, A, leads to the floor above at an angle of 45 -deg., through…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by15 opinions
- Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- McDonald v. Champion Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Forquer v. Slater Brick Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.