Pelton v. Schmidt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Negligence case. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 97 Mich. 231.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
A statement of the principal facts in this case will be found in the opinion filed upon a former review of the case, reported in 97 Mich. 231.
Upon a second trial the plaintiff testified that he had been in the habit of going through defendants* store from the back door to the desk, or other places in the store, to get his book receipted, after delivery of goods at the rear of the store, where he had been directed to leave them at-all times. One or more other truckmen gave similar testimony. His counsel now claim that this evidence brings the case within the rule stated in the former opinion. *347U…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tousey v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Engel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- O'Callaghan v. BodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hutchins v. Priestly Express Wagon & Sleigh Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Pelton v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life FellowshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Pollard v. Broadway Central Hotel Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Chattanooga Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.