River Construction Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
Plaintiff, on behalf of itself and its subcon-
tractor, Preload Central Corporation, seeks an equitable adjustment for alleged changes in plaintiff’s contract to construct a concrete water pipeline and damages for alleged unreasonable delays by the Government, amounting to a suspension of work in performance of the contract. The posture of the case before the court is that at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case-in-chief defendant moved to dismiss under Pule 49(c) on the ground that upon the facts and the law plaintiff had not shown a right to recover. The Trial Commissioner, Marion…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Chalender v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.