Legal Opinion

River Construction Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1962No. 13-56PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Plaintiff, on behalf of itself and its subcon-

tractor, Preload Central Corporation, seeks an equitable adjustment for alleged changes in plaintiff’s contract to construct a concrete water pipeline and damages for alleged unreasonable delays by the Government, amounting to a suspension of work in performance of the contract. The posture of the case before the court is that at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case-in-chief defendant moved to dismiss under Pule 49(c) on the ground that upon the facts and the law plaintiff had not shown a right to recover. The Trial Commissioner, Marion…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Chalender v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API