Legal Opinion

Volentine and Littleton v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1956No. 62-54PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*953MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff partnership had a contract with the Government to clear the timber from the site of the reservoir which was to be created by the Whitney Dam on the Brazos River in Texas. It •sues to recover alleged extra costs which it incurred because of the Government’s actions, and liquidated damages assessed against it by the Government. The plaintiff says that while it was performing the contract, the Government closed "the dam and thereby inundated the lower part of the plaintiff’s work.

The plaintiff’s contract contained a provision, lodging in the Government’s ■contracting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Klein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Williamsburg Drapery Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API