Legal Opinion
F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1955No. 49237PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
The plaintiff, F. H. McGraw and Company, alleged eight causes of action in its petition, but in its proposed findings before the Commissioner and its argument before the court it urges only two grounds for recovery: one is to recover damages for itself and its subcontractors for an alleged breach of contract arising out of a stop order issued by the Veterans Administration; the other is to recover increased wages for itself and its subcontractors which were paid under authorization of the Wage Adjustment Board.
The plaintiff entered into a standard form of contract with the United States…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brand Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.