Little v. Wilson Oil Corporation
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
A demurrer was sustained to the original complaint. Whereupon, the plaintiff filed an .amended 'Complaint. Defendants again demurred upon the ground that the -amended 'complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that it showed upon its face that plaintiff was guilty of 'contributory negligence 'as a matter of law. Judge Morris sustained the demurrer to the amended complaint, but his order does not 'State the ground upon which he ''based his decision.
This is a summary of the material allegations of the amended complaint: The defendant Worthington owns a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Standard Oil Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Sterns v. Highland Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Branks v. KernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Southern Railway Co. v. ADM Milling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.