Legal Opinion

Little v. Wilson Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1959No. 251PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

A demurrer was sustained to the original complaint. Whereupon, the plaintiff filed an .amended 'Complaint. Defendants again demurred upon the ground that the -amended 'complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that it showed upon its face that plaintiff was guilty of 'contributory negligence 'as a matter of law. Judge Morris sustained the demurrer to the amended complaint, but his order does not 'State the ground upon which he ''based his decision.

This is a summary of the material allegations of the amended complaint: The defendant Worthington owns a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Sterns v. Highland Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Branks v. KernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. ADM Milling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API