Legal Opinion

Branks v. Kern

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1987No. 662PA86PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Plaintiff sued her veterinarian after she was bitten by her own cat while it was being treated by the veterinarian. The Court of Appeals held that plaintiff had shown a sufficient forecast of evidence to enable a jury to find that the veterinarian violated a duty of due care to the plaintiff. We disagree and reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision.

The plaintiff in the instant case owned a cat named Sam. Sam suffered from feline urethral syndrome, a condition common in neutered male cats, marked by inflammation of the bladder and the production of stones. These stones can…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Mazzacco v. PurcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Garner v. Rentenbach Constructors Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API