Legal Opinion

Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1963No. 26PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The grounds for demurrer asserted by defendant are in substance: (1) The facts alleged do not constitute a taking of private property for public use in the constitutional sense and do not amount to a legally cognizable injury to property, but present an occurrence of incidental or consequential damage from flood waters against which, under the “common-enemy doctrine,” a land owner may protect himself by constructing walls, dams, barriers or other structures without exposing himself to liability for resulting injury to a neighboring landowner; and (2) if there was a taking, an action in…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API