Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. ADM Milling Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1982No. 8126SC992PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action to collect from defendant $52,987.53 which plaintiff had paid to its employee who was injured while working on a spur track serving defendant’s Mecklen-burg County plant. The basis of the action was an indemnity provision of contracts in which plaintiff and defendant’s predecessor in title agreed on the terms and conditions for the location and operation of the spur track on which the employee was injured.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed, raising as issues (1) whether the court correctly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Simmons v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Lorinovich v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Callander Ex Rel. Lingos v. Charleston Doughnut Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Cook v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API