Legal Opinion
BASF Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 19, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-131; Court No.: 02-00558PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge:
I
INTRODUCTION
The court again examines the principal use of certain imported beta-carotene products. This action involves classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) of the following goods: Betavit® 10% and Betavit® 20% (“Betavits”). U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified these goods under HTSUS Heading 2106, which includes “food preparation not elsewhere specified or included.” Plaintiff BASF Corp. (“Plaintiff’ or “BASF”) argues that these goods should instead be classified under HTSUS Subheading K3204, which…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.T. Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- WWRD U.S., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Danze, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.