Legal Opinion
BASF Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 10, 2007No. 2006-1387PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is a tariff classification case. BASF Corporation (“BASF”) appeals from judgment by the United States Court of International Trade (“trial court”), following a bench trial. See BASF Corp. v. United States, 427 F.Supp.2d 1200 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006). BASF objects to the classification of its imported polyisobutyl-ene amine (“PIBA”) product in subheading 3811.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Because the imported product is prima fade classifiable in Heading 3811 of the HTSUS, and because Heading 3811 is more specific than the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Drygel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Grk Canada, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.