Legal Opinion
Southern California Railway Co. v. O'Donnell
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1906No. Civ. No. 185PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Action to determine adverse interests in real property. Findings and judgment in favor of defendant as to certain of the premises described, from which plaintiff appeals, as well as from an order denying a new trial.
The claim of defendant to the property is based solely upon a lode mining location. The finding of the trial court that defendant, ever since the spring of 1883, was and has been the owner of and in possession of a specific portion of the disputed premises can only be taken as impliedly finding that the mineral location was actually made in 1883 as alleged; that the land was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co. v. ZieglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Argentine Mining Co. v. Terrible Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Washington & Idaho Railroad v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Trevaskis v. PeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frese v. Mutual Life Insurance of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Harper v. HilllCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ikola v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973