Harper v. Hilll
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. J. McGee, Wm. E. Colby, and George H. Thompson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants have appealed from the judgment and also from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff sued to recover possession of a mining claim known as the “Santa Ynez Gold Mine.” The principal controversy is in regard to the respective rights of the plaintiff and defendants to the southerly part of said Santa Ynez claim which overlaps the northerly part of a mining claim located by. the defendants known as the “Lookout Quartz Claim.” The defendants also claim practically the whole of the surface of the Santa Ynez Gold Mine by virtue of a certain alleged mining location…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Mining Co. v. TarbetSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. Gruen National Watch Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939