Legal Opinion

Frese v. Mutual Life Insurance of New York

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1909No. Civ. No. 598PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action to recover upon a life insurance policy. The complaint alleges: That about August 29, 1889, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy of insurance on the life of her husband, William Frese, agreeing thereby to pay to her $5,000 at his death; that the premiums due thereon were prior to his death fully paid; that on July 7, 1899, plaintiff’s said husband borrowed from defendant the sum of $1,930 repayable to defendant on August 29, 1900; that defendant required as security for said loan the pledge of said policy, and plaintiff assented thereto, and thereupon plaintiff and her said husband…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lowe v. OzmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Camp v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Colorado Springs Co. v. American Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. LazenbyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. BancroftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Traders Bank v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Morrow v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Hammond v. Volunteer State Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API