Trevaskis v. Peard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County and from an order denying a new.trial. Johr Caldwell, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
The action was' brought under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure to settle conflicting claims to the land in controversy, being certain placer mining claims. Thomas Peard is the only defendant interested in this hearing. But as he appears merely as respondent, and has himself prosecuted no appeal, his attack upon certain findings and conclusions of law which he claims are unsupported or unsound cannot be considered. The objections which maybe reviewed are those alone which appellant urges.
In 1887 the lands in question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Bell v. Bed Rock Tunnel & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Myers v. SpoonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Waring v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Seymour v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- CRS Recovery, Inc. v. LaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Oliver v. BurgOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Del Giorgio v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.