Legal Opinion
Renner v. Harsco Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 31, 2007No. 05-4201, 05-4216PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
A jury found that the Defendant, Harsco Corporation, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000 et. seq, and awarded the Plaintiff, Shannon Renner, $30,000 for pain and suffering, $30,000 for emotional distress, and $20,000 in punitive damages. The district court denied Harsco Corporation’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on liability for hostile work environment sexual harassment, but vacated the punitive damages award. Harsco Corporation appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law and one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Tademy v. Union Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Payan v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.