Legal Opinion
Payan v. United Parcel Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2018No. 16-4188PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Charles Payan appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service ("UPS") in relation to his claims for racial discrimination and retaliation arising under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 , as well as his state law claims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , we affirm.
I
Mr. Payan, who is Hispanic, has worked for UPS since 1991. He worked his way through the ranks and in 2006 was promoted to Security Manager of the Desert Mountain Salt…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Acosta v. Allegion, plcDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Acque v. AzarDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Ailin v. Leavenworth County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Al-Hammouri v. American Bottling CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Anderson v. Heartland Coca-ColaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.