Legal Opinion
Prost v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2011No. 08-1455PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Nearly a decade after Keith Prost pleaded guilty to engaging in a money laundering conspiracy, the Supreme Court issued United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 170 L.Ed.2d 912 (2008), interpreting the statute under which Mr. Prost stood convicted. In light of that new interpretation, Mr. Prost says his guilty plea should be revisited and his conviction undone. The problem is that Mr. Prost never pursued a statutory interpretation argument in his own trial court proceedings, on appeal, or in his initial collateral challenge to his conviction. And he…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Dan Carmichael McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- William Andrew Wright v. Stephen SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.