Dill v. Malot
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Geo. C. Crump, Judge. Action by Dona C. Malot against W. H. Dill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error to recover upon a promissory note for $700 executed by W. H. Dill and H. G. Malot, the husband of defendant in error, which said note was indorsed by H. G. Malot as follows: ‘Pay to Dona C. Malot, H. G. Malot.” Hereinafter the parties will be styled as they were in the trial court.
The petition avers that on the-day of-, 1914, and before maturity of said note, for a valuable consideration, and in due icourse of trade, said H. G. Malot indorsed, transferred and delivered said note to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Elliott v. CoggswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Krieger v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Allan v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Hart-Parr Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Reynolds v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.