E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error• from District Court, Comanche County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by James M. Brooks against tbe E. Van Winkle Gin & Machine Works. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
The above entitled cause has been before this court on a former appeal, and the opinion of the court is reported in 29 Okla. 351, 116 Pac. 908, where a full statement of the facts and the nature of the case may be found. As the opinion then rendered contains the law of the case upon the retrial ordered, there will be no restatement of the facts or re-examination of the points of law formerly decided, except such as may be necessary to an understanding of the new questions which arose on the retrial of the cause after it had been reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Upon the cause being…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Culp v. SteereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Z. J. Fort Produce Co. v. Southwestern Grain & Produce Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armstrong v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Rosser-Moon Furniture Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Harmon v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- City of Duncan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Dill v. MalotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.