Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 27, 1925No. 15985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
Delphia Reynolds and Joe Reynolds commenced their action in the district court of Okfuskee county, on March 7, 1922, against E. Schmidt and others, for possession of an undivided one- ourth interest in and to the lands described in the petition. The plaintiffs allege that the records of Okfuskee »county showed that Delphia Reynolds purported to have executed and delivered to one D. A. Hill1, on November 16, 1908, a deed to the undivided one-fourth interest in question; that the plaintiff Delphia Reynolds did not execute the deed, and that the same was a forgery; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Groom v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- MacKenzie v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Dill v. MalotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Reynolds v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Reynolds v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Gill v. GiacomoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971