Legal Opinion

Bradford and Walker v. Cline

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from- the District Court of Grant County; before John L. McAtee, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE FACTS. On the 28th day of April, 1898, D. L. Cline filed his petition in the district court of Grant county, Oklahoma, against. J. D. Alexander and W. A; Bradford, Jr., L. E. Walker, and' J. A. S. Graves, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of W. A. Bradford, Jr., and Co., L. E..

Read the full summary

Error from- the District Court of Grant County; before John L. McAtee, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE FACTS. On the 28th day of April, 1898, D. L. Cline filed his petition in the district court of Grant county, Oklahoma, against. J. D. Alexander and W. A; Bradford, Jr., L. E. Walker, and' J. A. S. Graves, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of W. A. Bradford, Jr., and Co., L. E.. Walker, as receiver of the Hutchinson and Southern railroad company, the Hutchinson and Southern railway company, a corporation, W. A. Bradford, Jr., L. E. Walker, and J. A. S. Graves. After several…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

InwiN, J.:

In this case the plaintiffs in error make five assignments of error. The first, second, fourth and fifth are based upon the refusal of the court to grant a new trial, and in the argument the counsel base these assignments upon ten grounds; all the said grounds except the first and fourth,depend for a decision upon the facts developed by the proof. These facts, or in fact, any facts or evidence upon which the referee or the trial court acted are not before this court. The certificate attached to the case-made is as follows:

“The above and foregoing case-made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hale v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Harrison v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Roy L. Bopst Roofing Co. v. Salem Trading & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Brougham v. Independent Potash & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Herring & Young v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API