Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Harman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1925No. 15961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

This appeal involves the right of John E. Harrison to claim certain monies exempt from seizure under execution.

In a case in the superior court of Okmulgee county, in which George W. Harmon was plaintiff and John E. Harrison was defendant, a judgment for damages in the sum of $300 was awarded plaintiff, and became final. .The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court in that action. In due course the plaintiff caused execution to be issued against the defendant’s property, and under the execution the sheriff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Ragains v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. Arnold v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Pappe v. American Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Midland Valley Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Tingley v. TingleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. ANDREW v. DEPANI-SPARKESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API