Herring & Young v. West
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Roger Mills County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by Herring & Young against John Ií. West ancl Milo Burlingame.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Roger Mills County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by Herring & Young against John Ií. West ancl Milo Burlingame. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. — Citing De Long ¶. Stahl, 13 Kan. 558. Citing: Sieker v. Pracht (Kan.) 18 Pac. 718; State Bank v. Showers (Kan.) 70 Pae. 332; Bradford v. Cline, 12 Olda. 339; In re Robinson, 104 N. Y. Supp. 588; In re Estate of Chambois, 12 Pac. 775; People v. Temple et al., 37 Pac. 414; Shore ei al. v. Bank, 59 Pac. 263.
1Opinion of the CourtTuRNER, J.
On August 18, 1905, plaintiffs in error, Herring & Young, sued defendants in error, John H. West and Milo Burlingame, in the district court of Roger Mills county. After answer in the nature of a cross-petition and reply thereto filed, the court on April 19, 1906, being of opinion that a trial of the issues necessitated an examination of mutual accounts between the parties, by consent referred the same to a referee both as to law and facts involved, with instructions to make full and final report at the next regular term of the court. Prior thereto, on August 1, 1906, pursuant to said order,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Dietrichs v. Lincoln & Northwestern R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Bradford and Walker v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Brown v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Gill v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hale v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bentley v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912