Legal Opinion
Roy L. Bopst Roofing Co. v. Salem Trading & Finance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 16195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THOMPSON, O.
This action was commenced in the district court of Washington county, Okla., by the Salem Trading & Finance Company, Inc., defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the Roy L. Bopst Roofing Company, a copartnership, composed of Roy L. Bopst, Wm. O. Bopst, and Ruby Irene Bopst, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover the sum of $216 with interest at six per cent, per annum from January 26, 1924, due on a bill of exchange drawn by the Asbestos Limited Corporation of New York against the Roy L. Bopst Roofing Company, dated at New York, October 26, 1923, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Bunker v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re School Dist. No. 26, Payne CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Britton v. Georgia St. Sav. Ass'n of Savannah, Ga.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938