River Birch Associates v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
At issue is a parcel of land of 3.0 acres, more or less, which plaintiff seeks to develop with town homes. Defendants claim this property has been set aside by the plaintiff as a recreation area for the benefit of the members of the River Birch Homeowners Association (hereinafter Homeowners Association). In its final judgment, the trial court found that the Raleigh City Code required the conveyance of the disputed property to the Homeowners Association and that such a requirement was not beyond the authority of the City. The court held further that there was no oral contract…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Sun Valley Iowa Lake Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of CabarrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.