Legal Opinion
Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 10, 2004No. CIV.A. DKC2004-0174PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution is the motion of Defendants Sensor-matic Electronics Corporation (Sensormatic) and ADT Security Services, Inc. (ADT) to dismiss the amended complaint of Sen-sormatic Security Corporation (SSC). 1 The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion will be denied in part and granted in part.
I. Introduction
This is the second breach of contract action Plaintiff has brought against the same defendants. The original action,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jenkins v. Gaylord Entertainment Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- HARDWIRE LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.