Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BENNETT, District Judge.
This action arises out of a business dispute between Plaintiff Three M Enterprises, Inc. (“Three M”) and Defendants Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc. (“Texas DAR”); Blankenship Aero, Inc. (“Blankenship Aero”); David M. Blakenship; William Hughes; and Harren Equity Partners. Texas DAR manufactures aftermarket products, for automobiles, such as spoilers and dash kits. Blankenship Aero is a subsidiary of Texas DAR, which markets and distributes Texas DAR’s products. Defendants Hughes and Blakenship are directors and officers of the two companies, and Harren…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Equal Rights Center v. Equity ResidentialDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Godfredson v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Scholl v. Sagon RV Supercenter, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- American Insurance Marketing Corp. v. 5 Star Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.