Legal Opinion

Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 5, 2005No. CIV. RDB 05-252PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BENNETT, District Judge.

This action arises out of a business dispute between Plaintiff Three M Enterprises, Inc. (“Three M”) and Defendants Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc. (“Texas DAR”); Blankenship Aero, Inc. (“Blankenship Aero”); David M. Blakenship; William Hughes; and Harren Equity Partners. Texas DAR manufactures aftermarket products, for automobiles, such as spoilers and dash kits. Blankenship Aero is a subsidiary of Texas DAR, which markets and distributes Texas DAR’s products. Defendants Hughes and Blakenship are directors and officers of the two companies, and Harren…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Equal Rights Center v. Equity ResidentialDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. Godfredson v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
  4. Scholl v. Sagon RV Supercenter, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. American Insurance Marketing Corp. v. 5 Star Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API