Legal Opinion
Connellan v. Himelhoch
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 30, 1981No. 79-72858PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge.
This case emanates from the plaintiff’s financially disastrous participation in a short-lived corporation; the National Institute of Behavior Change (NIBC). The complaint of plaintiff, Thomas K. Connellan, which was filed July 20, 1979, alleged that he was induced by the misleading representations of defendant Paul E. Himelhoch to become a shareholder in the NIBC. After the Institute had operated unsuccessfully for less than three months, the corporation was dissolved and plaintiff’s investment was lost. Mr. Connellan’s three-count complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,904 William H. Marx and Florence Marx, His Wife v. Computer Sciences CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- D.E. & J Ltd. Partnership v. ConawayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Estate of Detwiler v. OffenbecherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BlavinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Beissinger v. Rockwood Computer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.